Archive for December 14th, 2007

Fact Check: Les AuCoin’s Novick Endorsement Riddled With Crucial Factual Errors

Recently, former Congresman Les AuCoin endorsed Steve Novick in the Senate race.  Unfortunately, his endorsement of Steve Novick was as solid on the facts as Swiss cheese.  The errors are not small typos, but rather play a central role in AuCoin’s support for Novick. AuCoin goes down the HR2 rabbit hole:

Or, better, as House Minority Leader, Jeff could have out-maneuvered Republicans by engineering a Democratic Minority Report supporting the troops without glorifying Bush. Minority Reports are voted on before the bills to which they are attached; thus, it would have separated the issues, allowed Democrats to support the troops, and then oppose Bush on the war. It didn’t happen. This reveals a key difference between the Democratic candidates as we look for someone to effectively fight the neo-conservative putsch that threatens us.

Over at Preemptive Karma, Kevin writes a great post taking AuCoin to school for the factual errors:

Jeff Merkley wasn’t House Minority Leader in 2003. That job belonged to Deborah Kafoury. Furthermore, a Democratic Minority Report on the issue would have been sent out from the House Rules Committee and the Minority Leader didn’t serve on that committee that year. Maybe she could have pushed it through one of the members, but that’s a question for her, not Jeff Merkley.

Ironically, Kafoury has endorsed Novick. Will AuCoin be sitting Kafoury down at the next Novick holiday gathering and dressing her down for her lack of leadership on HR2? Not likely.

Personally, I don’t care about non-binding resolutions. I do, however, care about hypocrisy and this endorsement has more than its fair share of that. The main stated reason that AuCoin endorsed Novick over Merkley is that Deborah Kafoury, a Novick endorser, refused to, as Minority leader, get a minority report from her caucus on HR2.  Does that sound like a good reason to oppose Merkley to you? So are AuCoin and Novick going to ask Kafoury to take back her endorsement?  Did Kafoury cave to the GOP by not issuing a minority report? Or is it just not meaningful enough for Novick and AuCoin to stick to their principles here, unless they can use it as another shameless excuse to try to smear Merkley?

Finally, if AuCoin is so wrong about his chief issue in the race, can anyone trust his endorsement?

Blogged with Flock

Tags: , , , , , ,

4 comments December 14, 2007


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Mike on Why Smith is Scared: Jeff Merk…
Amuroroghok on Breaking: Candy Neville Did No…
barbara wright on About Forward Oregon
utteseEnlinny on Breaking: Candy Neville Did No…
Anonymous on About Forward Oregon

 

December 2007
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Archives

Blogroll

Feeds

Categories

Tags

2008 2008 Democratic Senate Primary Act Blue AFL-CIO AFSCME AFT Barack Obama Barbra Roberts bdunn Bill Sizemore BRO Card Check Cyreena Boston Democratic Primary Endorsements Environment Forward Oregon Forward Oregon Endorsements Franking Gordon Smith HD-45 Head Start Hillary Clinton IBEW Im Back Jeff Merkley jraad Kate Brown Labor Labor Unions New Year OR-Sen Oregon Legislation Oregon Senate Polling Shared Responsibility Model Sierra Club SoS State House Steve Novick Thesis Web Video why?